[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrWHA5ZmzOHnz9LO+7v4byc8QiynGyjE_ju5sjokNqrjZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:08:59 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Simo Sorce <ssorce@...hat.com>,
lpoetter@...hat.com, kay@...hat.com,
Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] net: Implement SO_PEERCGROUP and SO_PASSCGROUP socket options
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:05 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:15:44 -0400
>
>> This is another version of patchset to add support passing cgroup
>> information of client over unix socket API.
>
> I'm marking this patch series as "changes requested" in patchwork
> because if we still end up adding this feature SO_PASSCGROUP needs to
> be changed to behave like SO_PASSCRED.
>
> Specifically, like SO_PASSCRED, it should pass the "real" cgroup, ie.
> the cgroup at socket open() time.
>
I suspect that making this change will render it useless,
unfortunately. I really want to understand the use case.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists