[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5356CDDF.5000203@de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:15:27 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@...il.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
CC: Dominik Dingel <dingel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: async_pf: kill the unnecessary use_mm/unuse_mm
async_pf_execute()
On 21/04/14 15:25, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> async_pf_execute() has no reasons to adopt apf->mm, gup(current, mm)
> should work just fine even if current has another or NULL ->mm.
>
> Recently kvm_async_page_present_sync() was added insedie the "use_mm"
> section, but it seems that it doesn't need current->mm too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Indeed, use/unuse_mm should only be necessary for copy_to/from_user etc.
This is fine for s390, but it seems that x86 kvm_arch_async_page_not_present
might call apf_put_user which might call copy_to_user, so this is not ok, I guess.
> ---
> virt/kvm/async_pf.c | 2 --
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/async_pf.c b/virt/kvm/async_pf.c
> index 10df100..0ced4f3 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/async_pf.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/async_pf.c
> @@ -80,12 +80,10 @@ static void async_pf_execute(struct work_struct *work)
>
> might_sleep();
>
> - use_mm(mm);
> down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> get_user_pages(current, mm, addr, 1, 1, 0, NULL, NULL);
> up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> kvm_async_page_present_sync(vcpu, apf);
> - unuse_mm(mm);
>
> spin_lock(&vcpu->async_pf.lock);
> list_add_tail(&apf->link, &vcpu->async_pf.done);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists