[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140423024058.4725.71995.stgit@notabene.brown>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:40:58 +1000
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] MM: avoid throttling reclaim for loop-back nfsd threads.
When a loop-back NFS mount is active and the backing device for the
NFS mount becomes congested, that can impose throttling delays on the
nfsd threads.
These delays significantly reduce throughput and so the NFS mount
remains congested.
This results in a live lock and the reduced throughput persists.
This live lock has been found in testing with the 'wait_iff_congested'
call, and could possibly be caused by the 'congestion_wait' call.
This livelock is similar to the deadlock which justified the
introduction of PF_LESS_THROTTLE, and the same flag can be used to
remove this livelock.
To minimise the impact of the change, we still throttle nfsd when the
filesystem it is writing to is congested, but not when some separate
filesystem (e.g. the NFS filesystem) is congested.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index a9c74b409681..e011a646de95 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1424,6 +1424,18 @@ putback_inactive_pages(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct list_head *page_list)
list_splice(&pages_to_free, page_list);
}
+/* If a kernel thread (such as nfsd for loop-back mounts) services
+ * a backing device by writing to the page cache it sets PF_LESS_THROTTLE.
+ * In that case we should only throttle if the backing device it is
+ * writing to is congested. In other cases it is safe to throttle.
+ */
+static int current_may_throttle(void)
+{
+ return !(current->flags & PF_LESS_THROTTLE) ||
+ current->backing_dev_info == NULL ||
+ bdi_write_congested(current->backing_dev_info);
+}
+
/*
* shrink_inactive_list() is a helper for shrink_zone(). It returns the number
* of reclaimed pages
@@ -1552,7 +1564,8 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
* implies that pages are cycling through the LRU faster than
* they are written so also forcibly stall.
*/
- if (nr_unqueued_dirty == nr_taken || nr_immediate)
+ if ((nr_unqueued_dirty == nr_taken || nr_immediate)
+ && current_may_throttle())
congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
}
@@ -1561,7 +1574,8 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
* is congested. Allow kswapd to continue until it starts encountering
* unqueued dirty pages or cycling through the LRU too quickly.
*/
- if (!sc->hibernation_mode && !current_is_kswapd())
+ if (!sc->hibernation_mode && !current_is_kswapd()
+ && current_may_throttle())
wait_iff_congested(zone, BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive(zone->zone_pgdat->node_id,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists