[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fvl4sl3p.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:52:58 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] perf report: Count number of entries and samples separately
Hi Jiri,
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 16:51:03 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 05:49:43PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Those stats are counted counted in multiple places so that they can
>> confuse readers of the code. This is a preparation of later change
>> and do not intend any functional difference.
[SNIP]
>> + rep->nr_samples++;
>> + if (he->stat.nr_events == 1) {
>> + /* count new entries only */
>> + rep->nr_entries++;
>> + }
>
> smeels like we could use function for this ^^^
>
> also it took me a while to figure out the reason for the condition,
> maybe there could be more comment about that
Okay, so I changed it like below:
static void report__inc_stats(struct report *rep, struct hist_entry *he)
{
/*
* The @he is either of a newly created one or an existing one
* merging current sample. We only want to count a new one so
* checking ->nr_events being 1.
*/
if (he->stat.nr_events == 1)
rep->nr_entries++;
}
This also eliminated the unneeded nr_samples field.
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists