[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <75b16e54bf814a05b4e6bd4f3c005d13@BY2PR03MB505.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 05:08:21 +0000
From: "Li.Xiubo@...escale.com" <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCHv2 2/3] regmap: Add the DT binding documentation for
endianness
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@...nel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 5:10 AM
> To: Xiubo Li-B47053
> Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] regmap: Add the DT binding documentation for
> endianness
>
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 07:04:00AM +0000, Li.Xiubo@...escale.com wrote:
>
> > > Generally just not
> > > mentioning regmap is better for a binding definition, the binding should
> > > be usable by all OSs and not just Linux.
>
> > How about move the endianness OF parsing to the driver/of/ ?
> > Is this will be better ?
>
> Where the code is is sensible enough, it's an issue about how the
> binding documentation was written rather than about the code.
Sorry for late.
Well, I will try to enhance this.
Thanks,
BRs
Xiubo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists