lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 07:32:13 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugfix] sched: fix possible invalid memory access caused by CPU
 hot-addition

On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:45:13AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 	It's not for memoryless node, but to solve a race window
> in CPU hot-addition. The related CPU hot-addition flow is:
> 1) Handle CPU hot-addition event
> 1.a) gather platform specific information
> 1.b) associate hot-added CPU with a node
> 1.c) create CPU device
> 2) User online hot-added CPUs through sysfs:
> 2.a)	cpu_up()
> 2.b)		->try_online_node()
> 2.c)			->hotadd_new_pgdat()
> 2.d)			->node_set_online()
> 
> So between 1.b and 2.c, kmalloc_node(nid) may cause invalid
> memory access without the node_online(nid) check.

Any why was all this not in the Changelog?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists