[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zjjcfwz1.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:44:58 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Sergei Ianovich <ynvich@...il.com>
Cc: "Elliott\, Robert \(Server Storage\)" <Elliott@...com>,
"ynvich\@gmail.com" <ynvich@...il.com>,
"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fix printk output
Sergei Ianovich <ynvich@...il.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 15:59 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> BTW, did you actually hit this?
>
> # modprobe usb_storage
> [ 600.807274] usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage
> # modprobe -r usb_storage
> [ 604.216318] waiting module removal not supported: please upgrade[
> 604.222164] usbcore: deregistering interface driver usb-storage
> # modprobe -V
> kmod version 9
>
> I am using the latest kmod package from emdebian unstable-grip.
Sorry, was off on leave.
Hmm, Lucas intimated that kmod version 11 started passing this flag
correctly.
In fact, kmod's modprobe *never* used the O_NONBLOCK
(ie. KMOD_REMOVE_NOWAIT) flag, until it was finally enforced in
commit 7ab8804448377fb6b8854f2dd288608db01bb43b
Author: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
Date: Fri Sep 20 01:30:07 2013 -0500
See: tools/modprobe.c at that commit:
static int rmmod_do_remove_module(struct kmod_module *mod)
{
const char *modname = kmod_module_get_name(mod);
struct kmod_list *deps, *itr;
int flags = 0, err;
...
if (force)
flags |= KMOD_REMOVE_FORCE;
err = kmod_module_remove_module(mod, flags);
Perhaps we need to just get rid of the kernel message, since we're
getting far too many false reports :(
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists