[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140423055107.GB1429@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 07:51:07 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugfix] sched: fix possible invalid memory access caused by CPU
hot-addition
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 07:32:13AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:45:13AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> > It's not for memoryless node, but to solve a race window
> > in CPU hot-addition. The related CPU hot-addition flow is:
> > 1) Handle CPU hot-addition event
> > 1.a) gather platform specific information
> > 1.b) associate hot-added CPU with a node
> > 1.c) create CPU device
> > 2) User online hot-added CPUs through sysfs:
> > 2.a) cpu_up()
> > 2.b) ->try_online_node()
> > 2.c) ->hotadd_new_pgdat()
> > 2.d) ->node_set_online()
> >
> > So between 1.b and 2.c, kmalloc_node(nid) may cause invalid
> > memory access without the node_online(nid) check.
>
> Any why was all this not in the Changelog?
Also, do explain what kind of hardware you needed to trigger this. This
code has been like this for a good while.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists