[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <535714A1.9080502@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:17:21 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
Andy Lutomirski <amluto@...il.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Alexandre Julliard <julliard@...ehq.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: espfix for 64-bit mode *PROTOTYPE*
Another spin of the prototype. This one avoids the espfix for anything
but #GP, and avoids save/restore/saving registers... one can wonder,
though, how much that actually matters in practice.
It still does redundant SWAPGS on the slow path. I'm not sure I
personally care enough to optimize that, as it means some fairly
significant restructuring of some of the code paths. Some of that
restructuring might actually be beneficial, but still...
-hpa
View attachment "diff.txt" of type "text/plain" (11779 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists