[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5357A02B.8030404@de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:12:43 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/tool: Fix usage of trace events with '-' in trace
system name.
On 17/04/14 16:40, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 09:49:00PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> From: Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> Trace events potentially can have a '-' in their trace system name,
>> e.g. kvm on s390 defines kvm-s390:* tracepoints.
>> tools/perf could not parse them, because there was no rule for this:
>> $ sudo ./perf top -e "kvm-s390:*"
>> invalid or unsupported event: 'kvm-s390:*'
>>
>> This patch adds an extra rule to event_legacy_tracepoint which handles
>> those cases. Without the patch, perf will not accept such tracepoints in
>> the -e option.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/util/parse-events.y | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y
>> index 4eb67ec..dbbb01c 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y
>> @@ -299,6 +299,18 @@ PE_PREFIX_MEM PE_VALUE sep_dc
>> }
>>
>> event_legacy_tracepoint:
>> +PE_NAME '-' PE_NAME ':' PE_NAME
>> +{
>> + struct parse_events_evlist *data = _data;
>> + struct list_head *list;
>> + char sys_name[strlen($1) + strlen($3) + 2];
>
> hum, could you limit the size of sys_name array with some
> sane value? those strlens make me nervous :-\
Right. Something like
char sys_name[128];
[...]
snprintf(&sys_name, 128, "%s-%s", $1, $3);
should be enough for all trace event names. And if not, the event should simply fail.
Alexander,
can you send an updates patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists