linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 11/24] input: Port hid-holtekff to ff-memless-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1398255470.32091.3.camel@linux-fkkt.site>
Date:	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:17:50 +0200
From:	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
To:	Michal Malý <madcatxster@...oid-pointer.net>
Cc:	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, jkosina@...e.cz, elias.vds@...il.com,
	anssi.hannula@....fi, simon@...gewell.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/24] input: Port hid-holtekff to ff-memless-next

On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 15:59 +0200, Michal Malý wrote:
>  static int holtekff_play(struct input_dev *dev, void *data,
> -                        struct ff_effect *effect)
> +                        const struct mlnx_effect_command *command)
>  {
>         struct hid_device *hid = input_get_drvdata(dev);
>         struct holtekff_device *holtekff = data;
> +       const struct mlnx_rumble_force *rumble_force =
> &command->u.rumble_force;
>         int left, right;
>         /* effect type 1, length 65535 msec */
>         u8 buf[HOLTEKFF_MSG_LENGTH] =
>                 { 0x01, 0x01, 0xff, 0xff, 0x10, 0xe0, 0x00 };

On the kernel stack.

>  
> -       left = effect->u.rumble.strong_magnitude;
> -       right = effect->u.rumble.weak_magnitude;
> -       dbg_hid("called with 0x%04x 0x%04x\n", left, right);
> +       switch (command->cmd) {
> +       case MLNX_START_RUMBLE:
> +               left = rumble_force->strong;
> +               right = rumble_force->weak;
> +               dbg_hid("called with 0x%04x 0x%04x\n", left, right);
>  
> -       if (!left && !right) {
> -               holtekff_send(holtekff, hid, stop_all6);
> -               return 0;
> -       }
> +               if (!left && !right) {
> +                       holtekff_send(holtekff, hid, stop_all6);
> +                       return 0;
> +               }
>  
> -       if (left)
> -               buf[1] |= 0x80;
> -       if (right)
> -               buf[1] |= 0x40;
> +               if (left)
> +                       buf[1] |= 0x80;
> +               if (right)
> +                       buf[1] |= 0x40;
>  
> -       /* The device takes a single magnitude, so we just sum them
> up. */
> -       buf[6] = min(0xf, (left >> 12) + (right >> 12));
> +               /* The device takes a single magnitude, so we just sum
> them up. */
> +               buf[6] = min(0xf, (left >> 12) + (right >> 12));
>  
> -       holtekff_send(holtekff, hid, buf);
> -       holtekff_send(holtekff, hid, start_effect_1);
> +               holtekff_send(holtekff, hid, buf);
> +               holtekff_send(holtekff, hid, start_effect_1);
> +               return 0;
> +       case MLNX_STOP_RUMBLE:
> +               holtekff_send(holtekff, hid, stop_all6);
> +               return 0;
> +       default:
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }
>  
>         return 0;
>  }

This looks very much like doing DMA on the kernel stack.
That is very strictly forbidden. The bug is also in the current
code, but would you care to fix it up?

	Regards
		Oliver


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/