[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140423132829.GT24905@lukather>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:28:29 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Emilio Lopez <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
andriy.shevchenko@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zhuzhenhua@...winnertech.com, shuge@...winnertech.com,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, kevin.z.m.zh@...il.com,
sunny@...winnertech.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] ARM: sunxi: Split out the various machines into
separate files
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 02:33:50PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 17 April 2014, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > This will allow to add per-SoC hooks more easily.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Makefile | 6 +-
> > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/restart.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/restart.h | 20 ++++++
> > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sun4i.c | 36 ++++++++++
> > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sun5i.c | 37 ++++++++++
> > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sun6i.c | 49 +++++++++++++
> > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sun7i.c | 36 ++++++++++
> > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c | 164 ------------------------------------------
> > 8 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 165 deletions(-)
>
> This doesn't look like a move in the right direction, and I don't see
> the connection with the DMA driver.
This is actually not adding any code at all, just reorganizing it.
This was also something that would allow to have per-family
configuration options, and hence not select drivers like the pinctrl
one that are pretty huge if they're not needed.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/restart.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/restart.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..3b89727ee943
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/restart.c
>
> Splitting out the restart code is good, but please complete this by
> moving it into a driver directory. My preferred location would be
> within the watchdog driver, since it's really the same registers.
> You can turn on the watchdog driver as built-in in the defconfig.
> While it's not ideal that you can end up without a restart function
> if the driver does not get loaded, I would still prefer that over
> having the driver in the mach-sunxi directory.
Ok. The thing is, we don't have any watchdog driver for the A31 for
the moment, so the restart code will have to stay there. But I can
totally do that for the A10/A20.
> An alternative would be to move the restart code into
> drivers/power/reset.
That would be a good place for the A31 code then.
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c
> > deleted file mode 100644
> > index 460b5a4962ef..000000000000
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c
>
> Instead of splitting up this file, I think it would be better to
> reduce the number of special hacks required per machine. Note that
> for arm64 we require platforms not to have any code outside of
> the drivers directory, and I'd like to get to the same situation
> for much of arch/arm/mach-* as well.
I think it's fair.
How would you enforce default clock parenting and/or rate then?
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists