linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/11] ext4: add cross rename support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:21:36 +0200
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Zach Brown <zab@...hat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	"mszeredi@...e.cz" <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
	"linux-man@...r.kernel.org" <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] ext4: add cross rename support

On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
<mtk.manpages@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Miklos,
>
>> The code changes are pushed to the git tree and the updated man page is below.
>
> Now that renameat2() is in 3.15, I've taken these changes. This had to be
> manually does, because I'd done some major reworking on the pages since you
> originally wrote your text. So, I may have injected some errors.
>
> I did a little light reworking of the text and added VERSIONS and
> CONFORMING TO pieces. I also added a couple of FIXMEs, to note points
> that will need to be updated once glibc support is (presumably) added.
> (Carlos, what's the usual process for triggering that sort of thing?)
>
> Could you please review the diff below (now against rename(2)).

Looks okay.

One comment on the current rename.2 page:

  #include <fcntl.h>           /* Definition of AT_* constants */

AT_ constants are not used in renameat() hence this seems unneeded.

Not sure where the RENAME_ constants need to go once renameat2() is
added to glibc, possibly to <stdio.h> since they are closely related
to rename.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/