[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1398265053.1696.21.camel@leonhard>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 23:57:33 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] perf hists/tui: Count callchain rows separately
2014-04-23 (수), 16:29 +0200, Jiri Olsa:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 04:00:08PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > When TUI hist browser expands/collapses callchains it accounted number
> > of callchain nodes into total entries to show. However this code
> > ignores filtering so that it can make the cursor go to out of screen.
>
> SNIP
>
> hi,
> I needed following patch, otherwise following test case would segfault
>
> - record with -g
> - report - unfold one symbol
> - search for nonsense
>
> the reason is that after unfolding the symbol the nr_callchain_rows
> will get some number, which will cause the hist_browser__nr_entries
> function return (entries != 0) actually (entries == nr_callchain_rows)
> even if there's no entry passing the filter
Argh, right.. Thanks for spotting this. I guess other filters (thread,
dso) have same problem.
>
> fixing that by unfolding everything after the filter and reseting
> the nr_callchain_rows number
Hmm.. I think hists__remove_entry_filter() already folds them so how
about just setting ->nr_callchain_rows to 0 in hist_browser__reset()
instead?
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> feel free to merge this with your change if you agree ;-)
>
> thanks,
> jirka
>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c b/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
> index 5b81c0d..1cf5f45 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
> @@ -312,6 +312,8 @@ __hist_browser__set_folding(struct hist_browser *browser, bool unfold)
> struct rb_node *nd;
> struct hists *hists = browser->hists;
>
> + browser->nr_callchain_rows = 0;
> +
> for (nd = rb_first(&hists->entries);
> (nd = hists__filter_entries(nd, hists, browser->min_pcnt)) != NULL;
> nd = rb_next(nd)) {
> @@ -323,7 +325,6 @@ __hist_browser__set_folding(struct hist_browser *browser, bool unfold)
>
> static void hist_browser__set_folding(struct hist_browser *browser, bool unfold)
> {
> - browser->nr_callchain_rows = 0;
> __hist_browser__set_folding(browser, unfold);
>
> browser->b.nr_entries = hist_browser__nr_entries(browser);
> @@ -1507,6 +1508,7 @@ static int perf_evsel__hists_browse(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int nr_events,
> delay_secs * 2) == K_ENTER) {
> hists->symbol_filter_str = *buf ? buf : NULL;
> hists__filter_by_symbol(hists);
> + __hist_browser__set_folding(browser, false);
> hist_browser__reset(browser);
> }
> continue;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists