[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140423154211.GB2230@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 17:42:11 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: fix processing of pid/tid for mmap records
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 05:06:21PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
SNIP
> > That is probably the behaviour we both expect.
> >
> > Jiri's patch takes all mmap events as pid maps and creates an initial map
> > for them. All future threads that don't have mappings will trying to use
> > their pid's mapping as a fallback option.
> >
> > Because it is all pointer based now, updating the pid mappings
> > automatically update all the thread mappings too.
> >
> > I believe this approach will is the right one and makes sense. Do you
> > think that works for you?
> >
> I just tried Jiri's 5 patches and my JIT patches, and it does work correctly.
> My Java samples are correctly symbolized. So looks like we have a solution
> that works for both of us though it seems complicated. But I can live with it.
> Thanks Jiri.
can I take this for your Tested-by?
thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists