[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=WN4hVibiK_8+mpNfO7UQnd35ZT9EXA9fuw-mnBzzb1cA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:48:07 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
AJAY KUMAR RAMAKRISHNA SHYMALAMMA <ajaykumar.rs@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
Michael Spang <spang@...omium.org>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] regulator: tps65090: Allow setting the overcurrent
wait time
Lee,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>> The tps65090 regulator allows you to specify how long you want it to
>> wait before detecting an overcurrent condition. Allow specifying that
>> through the device tree (or through platform data).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Spang <spang@...omium.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
>> ---
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Fixed kernel-doc notation for return
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Separated the overcurrent and retries changes into two patches.
>> - Now set overcurrent at probe time since it doesn't change.
>>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt | 4 ++
>> drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h | 5 ++
>> 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
>
> Applied, thanks.
Ummmm, Mark said that he had already applied this patch to his tree (I
mentioned it in my recent summary and you can see it in this thread
too). I don't see it on git.kernel.org though
<https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git/log/?h=for-next>
I'm worried this will cause a merge conflict if you both apply it.
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists