linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5357FF8E.9010809@codesourcery.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Apr 2014 01:59:42 +0800
From:	Chung-Lin Tang <cltang@...esourcery.com>
To:	Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	<Catalin.Marinas@....com>, Andrew Pinski <apinski@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 22 April 2014 18:37:11 Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>>> >> Hi Arnd and Peter Anvin,
>>> >>
>>> >> Other than 64-bit time_t, clock_t and suseconds_t, can you confirm
>>> >> that we don't need to have 64 bit off_t? See detail in link below.
>>> >> I can submit the patches for 64-bit time changes
>>> >> (include/asm-generic/posix_types.h and other archs) if everyone is
>>> >> agreed on this.
>> >
>> > Yes.
> Okay, will doing that.

I believe that arm64 ILP32 will also be affected. What is the status of
this configuration? Has the glibc/kernel ABI been finalized?

Thanks,
Chung-Lin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/