[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1404231057470.2678@eggly.anvils>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: 3.15rc2 hanging processes on exit.
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > So for reasons I can't figure out, I've not been able to hit it on 3.14
Thanks for trying. Not the reassuring answer that I was hoping for,
so I'd better give it a little more thought, to see if we have some
reason in 3.15-rc why it should now appear. Not worth spending too
much effort on, though: Linus's fix looked good whatever.
> > The only 'interesting' thing I've hit in overnight testing is this, which
> > I'm not sure if I've also seen in my .15rc testing, but it doesn't look
> > familiar to me. (Though the vm oopses I've seen the last few months
> > are starting to all blur together in my memory)
> >
> >
> > kernel BUG at mm/mlock.c:82!
>
> That's
>
> mlock_vma_page:
> BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
>
> which is odd, because:
>
> > Call Trace:
> > [<ffffffffbe196612>] try_to_unmap_nonlinear+0x2a2/0x530
> > [<ffffffffbe1972a7>] rmap_walk+0x157/0x320
> > [<ffffffffbe1976e3>] try_to_unmap+0x93/0xf0
> > [<ffffffffbe1bb8f6>] migrate_pages+0x3b6/0x7b0
>
> All the calls to "try_to_unmap()" in mm/migrate.c are preceded by the pattern
>
> if (!trylock_page(page)) {
> ....
> lock_page(page);
> }
Yes, that's true of the mm/migrate.c end, but the nonlinear
try_to_unmap_cluster() (Being unable to point directly to the desired
page) does this thing of unmapping a cluster of (likely unrelated) pages,
in the hope that if it keeps getting called repeatedly, it will sooner or
later have unmapped everything required.
>
> where there are just a few "goto out" style cases for the "ok, we're
> not going to wait for this page lock" in there.
>
> Very odd. Does anybody see anything I missed?
Easily explained (correct me if I'm wrong): Dave is reporting this from
his testing of 3.14, but Linus is looking at his 3.15-rc git tree, which
now contains
commit 57e68e9cd65b4b8eb4045a1e0d0746458502554c
Author: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Date: Mon Apr 7 15:37:50 2014 -0700
mm: try_to_unmap_cluster() should lock_page() before mlocking
precisely to fix this (long-standing but long-unnoticed) issue,
which Sasha reported a couple of months ago.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists