[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53580DFC.9060507@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:01:16 +0200
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
CC: mtk.manpages@...il.com, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Zach Brown <zab@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"mszeredi@...e.cz" <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
"linux-man@...r.kernel.org" <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] ext4: add cross rename support
On 04/23/2014 04:21 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
> <mtk.manpages@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hi Miklos,
>>
>>> The code changes are pushed to the git tree and the updated man page is below.
>>
>> Now that renameat2() is in 3.15, I've taken these changes. This had to be
>> manually does, because I'd done some major reworking on the pages since you
>> originally wrote your text. So, I may have injected some errors.
>>
>> I did a little light reworking of the text and added VERSIONS and
>> CONFORMING TO pieces. I also added a couple of FIXMEs, to note points
>> that will need to be updated once glibc support is (presumably) added.
>> (Carlos, what's the usual process for triggering that sort of thing?)
>>
>> Could you please review the diff below (now against rename(2)).
>
> Looks okay.
Thanks for checking it.
> One comment on the current rename.2 page:
>
> #include <fcntl.h> /* Definition of AT_* constants */
>
> AT_ constants are not used in renameat() hence this seems unneeded.
I think you overlooked AT_FDCWD? (It is true though that that comment
is boilerplate across the *at() pages, some of which have several
AT_* constants.)
> Not sure where the RENAME_ constants need to go once renameat2() is
> added to glibc, possibly to <stdio.h> since they are closely related
> to rename.
Will you be prodding the glibc folks about this?
Thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists