[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140423190532.GE22755@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:05:32 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Simo Sorce <ssorce@...hat.com>,
lpoetter@...hat.com, kay@...hat.com,
Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] net: Implement SO_PEERCGROUP and SO_PASSCGROUP
socket options
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:31:13PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
[..]
> > Otherwise, without SO_PASSCGROUP, there is no way for datagram sockets
> > to find out the peer's open() time cgroup.
>
> Right.
>
> I'd still like to know what userspace applications want this feature.
> The canonical example seems to be journald, but journald doesn't use
> unix datagram sockets AFAICS,
Dan Walsh mentiond that systemd also monitors /dev/log (datagram socket) and
logs everything in journal. There this information should be useful.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists