[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbk8okbzaZgD=BqeMSOvbEvYNViqamd9i=NAaAWW=T9sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:20:12 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
Cc: "Westerberg, Mika" <mika.westerberg@...el.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] pinctrl: add Intel BayTrail GPIO/pinctrl support
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> How are the pin muxes normally configured in ACPI?
VERY good question.
> All of our GPIOs have a
> pinmux on them, and so if you want to use the pin for the non-default
> functionality, you need to configure the mux. Isn't that supposed to happen
> with the through the pinctrl driver? That is, when the kernel parses the
> ASL, and it seems a command to configure pin #3 to function #4, it calls the
> local pinctrl driver to do that?
Let's suspect this is true. That is how GPIO work after all is it not?
I guess the other option would be that all systems must come with a
tailored set-up written in ASL, specific for each board configuration.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists