[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140424215552.792043149@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:56:01 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@...hat.com>,
Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Lennart Poettering <lpoetter@...hat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.4 27/27] wait: fix reparent_leader() vs EXIT_DEAD->EXIT_ZOMBIE race
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
commit dfccbb5e49a621c1b21a62527d61fc4305617aca upstream.
wait_task_zombie() first does EXIT_ZOMBIE->EXIT_DEAD transition and
drops tasklist_lock. If this task is not the natural child and it is
traced, we change its state back to EXIT_ZOMBIE for ->real_parent.
The last transition is racy, this is even documented in 50b8d257486a
"ptrace: partially fix the do_wait(WEXITED) vs EXIT_DEAD->EXIT_ZOMBIE
race". wait_consider_task() tries to detect this transition and clear
->notask_error but we can't rely on ptrace_reparented(), debugger can
exit and do ptrace_unlink() before its sub-thread sets EXIT_ZOMBIE.
And there is another problem which were missed before: this transition
can also race with reparent_leader() which doesn't reset >exit_signal if
EXIT_DEAD, assuming that this task must be reaped by someone else. So
the tracee can be re-parented with ->exit_signal != SIGCHLD, and if
/sbin/init doesn't use __WALL it becomes unreapable.
Change reparent_leader() to update ->exit_signal even if EXIT_DEAD.
Note: this is the simple temporary hack for -stable, it doesn't try to
solve all problems, it will be reverted by the next changes.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Reported-by: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@...hat.com>
Reported-by: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Lennart Poettering <lpoetter@...hat.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/exit.c | 15 +++++++++++----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -761,9 +761,6 @@ static void reparent_leader(struct task_
struct list_head *dead)
{
list_move_tail(&p->sibling, &p->real_parent->children);
-
- if (p->exit_state == EXIT_DEAD)
- return;
/*
* If this is a threaded reparent there is no need to
* notify anyone anything has happened.
@@ -771,9 +768,19 @@ static void reparent_leader(struct task_
if (same_thread_group(p->real_parent, father))
return;
- /* We don't want people slaying init. */
+ /*
+ * We don't want people slaying init.
+ *
+ * Note: we do this even if it is EXIT_DEAD, wait_task_zombie()
+ * can change ->exit_state to EXIT_ZOMBIE. If this is the final
+ * state, do_notify_parent() was already called and ->exit_signal
+ * doesn't matter.
+ */
p->exit_signal = SIGCHLD;
+ if (p->exit_state == EXIT_DEAD)
+ return;
+
/* If it has exited notify the new parent about this child's death. */
if (!p->ptrace &&
p->exit_state == EXIT_ZOMBIE && thread_group_empty(p)) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists