[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140424220024.GA27250@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:24 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...os.cz>
Subject: Re: [bisect result] Re: 3.15-rc2: i915 regression: only top 20% of
screen works in X
Hi!
> > > And if you can indeed reliably reproduce this a bisect could be really useful.
> >
> > And we have a winner here :-)
> >
> > Ok, it was not as painfull as I feared.
> >
> > It does not revert cleanly, but doing it by hand was not that bad.
>
> Oh my. That is bizarre, can you check whether you have
> commit 9991ae787a0c87fe7c783b4b6f4754c3cdbb6213
> Author: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
> Date: Wed Apr 2 16:36:07 2014 +0100
>
> drm/i915: Move all ring resets before setting the HWS page
>
> in your latest kernel? That just makes
No, I don't have that one.
> To confirm, on drm-intel-nightly you used a patch like:
I did not use drm-intel-nightly, but 3.15-rc2, because
drm-intel-nightly did not work at all. (Netconsole is not that easy to
set up, and I'd prefer not debugging 2 problems at the same time.)
Let me check with my patch reverted and 9991ae applied.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists