linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.4 03/27] net: unix: non blocking recvmsg() should not return -EINTR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140424221910.GA4098@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:19:10 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.4 03/27] net: unix: non blocking recvmsg() should not
 return -EINTR

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:01:54PM +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> > 3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > know.
> 
> Since this is a machine generated bulk e-mail (as far as I understand
> this) which is specifically not intended to be sent to me as person, as
> per Eric Dumazet earlier statements, I object to being on the recipient
> list without an opportunity to be removed from it as I have repeatedly
> requested.

Yes, you are right, this is an automated email, based on the changelog
comments in the kernel source tree, sorry about that.

> Insofar my understanding of European spam legislation goes, this is
> illegal.

Glad I don't live in Europe :)

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/