[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140424214452.985741037@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:48:36 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 23/33] Btrfs: check for an extent_op on the locked ref
3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
commit 573a075567f0174551e2fad2a3164afd2af788f2 upstream.
We could have possibly added an extent_op to the locked_ref while we dropped
locked_ref->lock, so check for this case as well and loop around. Otherwise we
could lose flag updates which would lead to extent tree corruption. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -2444,7 +2444,8 @@ static noinline int __btrfs_run_delayed_
spin_unlock(&locked_ref->lock);
spin_lock(&delayed_refs->lock);
spin_lock(&locked_ref->lock);
- if (rb_first(&locked_ref->ref_root)) {
+ if (rb_first(&locked_ref->ref_root) ||
+ locked_ref->extent_op) {
spin_unlock(&locked_ref->lock);
spin_unlock(&delayed_refs->lock);
continue;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists