linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] SDHCI should use more common MMC structs and functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAYSxhpvT4CcwgKvefZFHeQ6YjVSyoCtgCv4ZMB==O5CMP+usg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:35:55 -0700
From:	Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@...aro.org>
To:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:	Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
	Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>,
	Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
	Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] SDHCI should use more common MMC structs and functions

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 18 April 2014 02:46, Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@...aro.org> wrote:
>> This series updates SDHCI to use the common regulator infrastructure that mmc
>> core provides.
>>
>> Tim Kryger (2):
>>   mmc: sdhci: Use supplies in common mmc_host struct
>>   mmc: sdhci: Use common mmc_regulator_get_supply
>
> Both patches looks good, but I would prefer if you could squash them
> into one patch.

Sure.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/