[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140424232916.GD25446@logfs.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:29:16 -0400
From: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cxie@...hat.com,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Print cpu number along with time
On Fri, 25 April 2014 00:21:20 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> > > Well, if you have dmesg dump from panic that happens every other year, and
> > > you have to do post-mortem analysis on it, I am pretty sure you would love
> > > to be able to figure out how the stack traces would look like without
> > > inter-CPU interleaving. And I am pretty sure you wouldn't want to
> > > insert/enable a tracepoint and wait another two years for the bug to
> > > trigger again.
> >
> > Sounds like the appropriate fix would be to serialize stack dumping to the
> > kernel log.
>
> That's rather difficult, as it can be done both from NMI and non-NMI
> contexts, and those are very hard to synchronize.
It is also easy to get wrong and cause a panic() that doesn't reboot
but instead gets stuck somewhere.
Plus, you might want similar serialization for other multi-line debug
messages. Scsi error messages come to mind, but we have many more
examples.
Jörn
--
Any headline which ends in a question mark can be answered by the word 'no'.
-- Betteridge's Law
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists