[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140424234941.GA18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:49:41 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: fs: dcookie: freeing active timer
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:55:58PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 01:34:14PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>
> > > Why does that code bother with destroying/creating that sucker dynamically?
> > > Is there any point at all?
> >
> > I'm not sure about the dynamic allocation part, but I fear that if we just
> > switch to using static allocations it'll hide the underlying issue that
> > triggered this bug instead of fixing it.
>
> FWIW, slub.c variant of kmem_cache_destroy() is buggered - struct kobject
> embedded into struct kmem_cache, its ktype is slab_ktype, which has
> NULL ->release()...
BTW, if your config has CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE, that's exactly where
that warning comes from. Got broken by commit b7454a,
Author: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Date: Fri Oct 19 18:20:25 2012 +0400
mm/sl[au]b: Move slabinfo processing to slab_common.c
We *do* need ->release(). Greg and guilty parties Cc'd...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists