[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1398328099.6486.29.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:28:19 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
alex.shi@...aro.org, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, morten.rasmussen@....com, aswin@...com,
chegu_vinod@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched, fair: Stop searching for tasks in newidle
balance if there are runnable tasks
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 04:51 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Checking rq->lock for contention before ever going to idle balancing as
> well should give you a bit more. No need to run around looking for work
> that's trying to arrive. By not going there, perhaps stacking tasks,
> you may head off a future bounce as well.
Zzt. Bailing without drop/retake to let work land would be a bad plan.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists