linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 17/28] nios2: Signal handling support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5358E9EB.8080307@nod.at>
Date:	Thu, 24 Apr 2014 12:39:39 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>
CC:	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	cltang@...esourcery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/28] nios2: Signal handling support

Am 24.04.2014 12:29, schrieb Ley Foon Tan:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
> 
>>>> Okay.
>>>>
>>> I just noticed that sigsp() have struct ksignal argument. We can use
>>> sigsp() for nios2 because it doesn't have struct ksignal.
>>>
>>> unsigned long sigsp(unsigned long sp, struct ksignal *ksig);
>>
>> Did you at look at the struct ksignal definition and the clean series I've
>> pointed you to?
>>
> 
> Not yet, this is the full set of patches? I only see partial..
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/2/198

Maybe lkml.org misses a few but this does not matter.
All you need to know is that using ksignal is easy.
e.g. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/2/162

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/