linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1398306278.29638.42.camel@jtkirshe-mobl>
Date:	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:24:38 -0700
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>,
	Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 11:47 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_mac.c between commit c5ffe7e1f745
> ("e1000e/igb/ixgbe/i40e: fix message terminations") from the net tree
> and
> commit c75c4edfc38d ("igb: Cleanups for messaging") from the net-next
> tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (the former was a superset of the latter) and can carry
> the
> fix as necessary (no action is required).

Huh, I thought the commit c75c4edfc38d ("igb: Cleanups for messaging")
in Dave's net-next already took into account the changes in net.  I will
take a look at your fix Stephen, thanks for letting us know.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)