[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140424115519.GB8882@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:55:19 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <aarapov@...hat.com>,
David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] uprobes/tracing: Make uprobe_perf_close() visible
to uprobe_perf_open()
Preparation. Move uprobe_perf_close() up before uprobe_perf_open() to
avoid the forward declaration in the next patch and make it readable.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index 930e514..1ed0030 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -1003,54 +1003,54 @@ uprobe_filter_event(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
return __uprobe_perf_filter(&tu->filter, event->hw.tp_target->mm);
}
-static int uprobe_perf_open(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
+static int uprobe_perf_close(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
{
bool done;
write_lock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
if (event->hw.tp_target) {
- /*
- * event->parent != NULL means copy_process(), we can avoid
- * uprobe_apply(). current->mm must be probed and we can rely
- * on dup_mmap() which preserves the already installed bp's.
- *
- * attr.enable_on_exec means that exec/mmap will install the
- * breakpoints we need.
- */
+ list_del(&event->hw.tp_list);
done = tu->filter.nr_systemwide ||
- event->parent || event->attr.enable_on_exec ||
+ (event->hw.tp_target->flags & PF_EXITING) ||
uprobe_filter_event(tu, event);
- list_add(&event->hw.tp_list, &tu->filter.perf_events);
} else {
+ tu->filter.nr_systemwide--;
done = tu->filter.nr_systemwide;
- tu->filter.nr_systemwide++;
}
write_unlock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
if (!done)
- uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, true);
+ uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, false);
return 0;
}
-static int uprobe_perf_close(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
+static int uprobe_perf_open(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
{
bool done;
write_lock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
if (event->hw.tp_target) {
- list_del(&event->hw.tp_list);
+ /*
+ * event->parent != NULL means copy_process(), we can avoid
+ * uprobe_apply(). current->mm must be probed and we can rely
+ * on dup_mmap() which preserves the already installed bp's.
+ *
+ * attr.enable_on_exec means that exec/mmap will install the
+ * breakpoints we need.
+ */
done = tu->filter.nr_systemwide ||
- (event->hw.tp_target->flags & PF_EXITING) ||
+ event->parent || event->attr.enable_on_exec ||
uprobe_filter_event(tu, event);
+ list_add(&event->hw.tp_list, &tu->filter.perf_events);
} else {
- tu->filter.nr_systemwide--;
done = tu->filter.nr_systemwide;
+ tu->filter.nr_systemwide++;
}
write_unlock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
if (!done)
- uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, false);
+ uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, true);
return 0;
}
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists