[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140424125904.GY24905@lukather>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:59:04 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, wim@...ana.be,
dbaryshkov@...il.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, arm@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: sunxi: Remove sun4i and sun7i machine
definitions
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 06:02:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 April 2014 17:04:36 Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >
> > -static void __init sunxi_dt_init(void)
> > -{
> > - of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static const char * const sunxi_board_dt_compat[] = {
> > - "allwinner,sun4i-a10",
> > - "allwinner,sun5i-a10s",
> > - "allwinner,sun5i-a13",
> > - NULL,
> > -};
> > -
> > -DT_MACHINE_START(SUNXI_DT, "Allwinner A1X (Device Tree)")
> > - .init_machine = sunxi_dt_init,
> > - .dt_compat = sunxi_board_dt_compat,
> > -MACHINE_END
> > -
> > static const char * const sun6i_board_dt_compat[] = {
> > "allwinner,sun6i-a31",
> > NULL,
>
> I'd like to hear more opinions on this. We could either rely
> on the generic code, or we could keep the entry with just
> the .dt_compat line and the name, so /proc/cpuinfo contains
> a meaningful platform name.
Ah! I haven't thought of /proc/cpuinfo. I agree that having something
meaningful in there would be much better.
I'll respin the patch if Olof agrees.
Thanks!
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists