[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140424150644.GP26661@saruman.home>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:06:44 -0500
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com>
CC: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"myungjoo.ham@...sung.com" <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
<gg@...mlogic.co.uk>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
<ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/9] extcon: Add devm_extcon_dev_allocate/free to
manage the resource of extcon device
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:03:31AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:34:50PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> >> This patch add device managed devm_extcon_dev_{allocate,free} to automatically
> >> free the memory of extcon_dev structure without handling free operation.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >> include/linux/extcon.h | 11 +++++++
> >> 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
> >> index bec66d4..f369168 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
> >> @@ -604,6 +604,64 @@ void extcon_dev_free(struct extcon_dev *edev)
> >> }
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(extcon_dev_free);
> >>
> >> +static int devm_extcon_dev_match(struct device *dev, void *res, void *data)
> >> +{
> >> + struct extcon_dev **r = res;
> >> +
> >> + if (!r || !*r) {
> >> + WARN_ON(!r || !*r);
> >> + return 0;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return *r == data;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void devm_extcon_dev_release(struct device *dev, void *res)
> >> +{
> >> + extcon_dev_free(*(struct extcon_dev **)res);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * devm_extcon_dev_allocate - Allocate managed extcon device
> >> + * @dev: device owning the extcon device being created
> >> + * @supported_cable: Array of supported cable names ending with NULL.
> >> + * If supported_cable is NULL, cable name related APIs
> >> + * are disabled.
> >> + *
> >> + * This function manages automatically the memory of extcon device using device
> >> + * resource management and simplify the control of freeing the memory of extcon
> >> + * device.
> >> + *
> >> + * Returns the pointer memory of allocated extcon_dev if success or NULL if fail
> >> + */
> >> +struct extcon_dev *devm_extcon_dev_allocate(struct device *dev,
> >> + const char **supported_cable)
> >> +{
> >> + struct extcon_dev **ptr, *edev;
> >> +
> >> + ptr = devres_alloc(devm_extcon_dev_release, sizeof(*ptr), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!ptr)
> >> + return NULL;
> >
> > if this fails you return NULL;
> >
> >> +
> >> + edev = extcon_dev_allocate(supported_cable);
> >
> > if this fails, you return -ENOMEM. Not very nice, if you ask me.
>
> I'll fix it as following:
>
> If both extcon_dev_allocate() and devm_excon_dev_allocate() failed to
> allocate memory,
> two functions would return NULL pointer instead of ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM).
your call, I'd rather see them both returning ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM), but no
strong feelings.
cheers
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists