[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1507372.PrIsjf4qYL@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:13:49 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, alex.shi@...aro.org,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, morten.rasmussen@....com,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched: idle: Provide the basis to integrate cpuidle
On Thursday, April 24, 2014 02:24:48 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> This patchset provides three patches for the basis to integrate cpuidle with
> the scheduler.
>
> The first patch is a cleanup.
> The second one adds the sched balance option as requested by Ingo.
> The third one stores the idle state a cpu is and adds a rcu_barrier() to
> prevent races when using the pointed object.
>
> This patchset is based on top of v3.15-rc2.
>
> This patchset does not modify the behavior of the scheduler.
>
> Taking into account the cpuidle information from the scheduler will be
> posted in a separate patchset in order to keep focused on the right decisions
> the scheduler should take regarding the policy vs idle parameters.
>
> Daniel Lezcano (3):
> sched: idle: Encapsulate the code to compile it out
> sched: idle: Add sched balance option
> sched: idle: Store the idle state the cpu is
Please rebase patch [1/3] on top of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4021831/
I agree with the Amit's comment regarding the power supply assumption in
patch [2/3].
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 6 ++
> include/linux/sched/sysctl.h | 14 ++++
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> kernel/sched/idle.c | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 5 ++
> kernel/sysctl.c | 11 +++
> 6 files changed, 220 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
>
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists