[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <535938F8.3070300@nod.at>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:16:56 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>
CC: Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
cltang@...esourcery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/28] nios2: Signal handling support
Am 24.04.2014 12:46, schrieb Ley Foon Tan:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
>> Am 24.04.2014 12:29, schrieb Ley Foon Tan:
>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Okay.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I just noticed that sigsp() have struct ksignal argument. We can use
>>>>> sigsp() for nios2 because it doesn't have struct ksignal.
>>>>>
>>>>> unsigned long sigsp(unsigned long sp, struct ksignal *ksig);
>>>>
>>>> Did you at look at the struct ksignal definition and the clean series I've
>>>> pointed you to?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not yet, this is the full set of patches? I only see partial..
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/2/198
>>
>> Maybe lkml.org misses a few but this does not matter.
>> All you need to know is that using ksignal is easy.
>> e.g. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/2/162
>>
> Thanks. I am looking at your git tree
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rw/misc.git/log/?h=signal_v2
> Are these patches already available in v3.15 rc?
Nope, I have to rebase them again.
But some archs have picked up the changes already.
> I can update nios2 to use new implementation.
Would be great. :)
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists