linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] sysrq,rcu: suppress RCU stall warnings while sysrq runs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 Apr 2014 08:16:00 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	joern@...fs.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, cxie@...hat.com,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] sysrq,rcu: suppress RCU stall warnings while sysrq
 runs

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:04:52AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> As suggested by Paul McKenney...
> 
> This seems small and simple enough that it should not introduce any
> extra maintenance work in the future.
> 
> ---8<---
> 
> Some sysrq handlers can run for a long time, because they dump a lot
> of data onto a serial console. Having RCU stall warnings pop up in
> the middle of them only makes the problem worse.
> 
> This patch temporarily disables RCU stall warnings while a sysrq
> request is handled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Suggested-by: Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

I guess this means you like the idea.  ;-)

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

> ---
>  drivers/tty/sysrq.c      |  2 ++
>  include/linux/rcupdate.h |  2 ++
>  kernel/rcu/update.c      | 11 +++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
> index 3c61e9b..dd53af9 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
> @@ -511,6 +511,7 @@ void __handle_sysrq(int key, bool check_mask)
>  	int orig_log_level;
>  	int i;
> 
> +	rcu_sysrq_start();
>  	rcu_read_lock();
>  	/*
>  	 * Raise the apparent loglevel to maximum so that the sysrq header
> @@ -554,6 +555,7 @@ void __handle_sysrq(int key, bool check_mask)
>  		console_loglevel = orig_log_level;
>  	}
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	rcu_sysrq_end();
>  }
> 
>  void handle_sysrq(int key)
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index 00a7fd6..b9a95f8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -227,6 +227,8 @@ void rcu_idle_enter(void);
>  void rcu_idle_exit(void);
>  void rcu_irq_enter(void);
>  void rcu_irq_exit(void);
> +void rcu_sysrq_start(void);
> +void rcu_sysrq_end(void);
> 
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS
>  void rcu_user_enter(void);
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c
> index 4c0a9b0..2ac3289 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
> @@ -320,6 +320,17 @@ int rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check(void)
>  	return till_stall_check * HZ + RCU_STALL_DELAY_DELTA;
>  }
> 
> +void rcu_sysrq_start(void)
> +{
> +	rcu_cpu_stall_suppress = 2;
> +}
> +
> +void rcu_sysrq_end(void)
> +{
> +	if (rcu_cpu_stall_suppress == 2)
> +		rcu_cpu_stall_suppress = 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int rcu_panic(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev, void *ptr)
>  {
>  	rcu_cpu_stall_suppress = 1;
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/