linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] uprobes/x86: Refuse to attach uprobe to "word-sized" branch insns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140424173333.GA416@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:33:33 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uprobes/x86: Refuse to attach uprobe to "word-sized"
	branch insns

Thanks!

Masami, Jim, any acks?

On 04/24, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>
> All branch insns on x86 can be prefixed with the operand-size
> override prefix, 0x66. It was only ever useful for performing
> jumps to 32-bit offsets in 16-bit code segments.
>
> In 32-bit code, such instructions are useless since
> they cause IP truncation to 16 bits, and in case of call insns,
> they save only 16 bits of return address and misalign
> the stack pointer as a "bonus".
>
> In 64-bit code, such instructions are treated differently by Intel
> and AMD CPUs: Intel ignores the prefix altogether,
> AMD treats them the same as in 32-bit mode.
>
> Before this patch, the emulation code would execute
> the instructions as if they have no 0x66 prefix.
>
> With this patch, we refuse to attach uprobes to such insns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> index ace2291..29b152d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> @@ -582,6 +582,7 @@ static struct uprobe_xol_ops branch_xol_ops = {
>  /* Returns -ENOSYS if branch_xol_ops doesn't handle this insn */
>  static int branch_setup_xol_ops(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
>  {
> +	int i;
>  	u8 opc1 = OPCODE1(insn);
>
>  	/* has the side-effect of processing the entire instruction */
> @@ -612,6 +613,17 @@ static int branch_setup_xol_ops(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
>  			return -ENOSYS;
>  	}
>
> +	/*
> +	 * 16-bit overrides such as CALLW (66 e8 nn nn) are not supported.
> +	 * Intel and AMD behavior differ in 64-bit mode: Intel ignores 66 prefix.
> +	 * No one uses these insns.
> +	 * Reject any branch insns with such prefix.
> +	 */
> +	for (i = 0; i < insn->prefixes.nbytes; i++) {
> +		if (insn->prefixes.bytes[i] == 0x66)
> +			return -ENOTSUPP;
> +	}
> +
>  	auprobe->branch.opc1 = opc1;
>  	auprobe->branch.ilen = insn->length;
>  	auprobe->branch.offs = insn->immediate.value;
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/