[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFiDJ5-GbGquUmYkbtYZ7m+tT8-UHphR-4smtri1rOdadsRSnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:04:39 +0800
From: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
cltang@...esourcery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/28] nios2: Exception handling
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> >> We really shouldn't be doing new architecture specific procfs files
>> >> any more. I suggest you drop this one for now, and add back the
>> >> functionality using perf or ftrace at a later point.
>> >
>> > Okay, will remove this.
>>
>> MIPS and powerpc handle this through debugfs, cfr.
>> arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c and arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c.
>
> Ah, right, that would work too. Being able to use perf from user
> space sounds more flexible though. It's certainly something that
> can be decided later.
Yes, we can add this back through debugfs or perf in later.
Regards
Ley Foon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists