lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:15:11 -0700
From:	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] usb/xhci: fix compilation warning when !CONFIG_PCI
 && !CONFIG_PM

Hi Greg,

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:50:32PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:23:02PM +0300, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> > From: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
> > 
> > When CONFIG_PCI and CONFIG_PM are not selected, xhci.c gets this
> > warning:
> > drivers/usb/host/xhci.c:409:13: warning: ‘xhci_msix_sync_irqs’ defined
> > but not used [-Wunused-function]
> > 
> > Instead of creating nested #ifdefs, this patch fixes it by defining the
> > xHCI PCI stubs as inline.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> What patch caused this problem?  Does it show up in 3.14?  3.10?  2.0?
> :)
> 
> Please be more specific...

I first noticed this warning on 3.13, but I believe it is older :)
You may consider this patch as an extension of this other one:

commit d5c82feb5cf8026cd4af048330fdcd46e861c686
Author: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Date:   Tue Jul 23 11:58:20 2013 -0700

    usb: xhci: Mark two functions __maybe_unused
--

IMO it makes sense to apply whenever the other patch exists.

Br, David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ