[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <535A1F53.5040806@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:09:47 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq, longhaul: Fix double invocation of cpufreq_freq_transition_begin/end
On 04/25/2014 02:07 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 25 April 2014 13:48, Srivatsa S. Bhat
> <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c
>
>> @@ -269,8 +269,6 @@ static void longhaul_setstate(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>
> This routine has this code as well:
>
> mult = mults[mults_index & 0x1f];
> if (mult == -1)
> return;
> speed = calc_speed(mult);
> if ((speed > highest_speed) || (speed < lowest_speed))
> return;
>
> And so it might return without changing frequency and that's why I
> left this driver earlier for this change.. So, please return -EINVAL
> from here..
>
Ok, I'll address this in the next version. Thanks for pointing
this out!
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists