[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D0F6FEEB0@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 09:42:45 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Yijing Wang' <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"sparclinux@...r.kernel.org" <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/13] Refactor pci_is_brdige() to simplify code
From: Yijing Wang
> This patchset rename the current pci_is_bridge() to pci_has_subordinate(),
> and introduce a new pci_is_bridge() which determine pci bridge by check
> dev->hdr_type. The new one is more accurate. PCIe Spec define the pci
> device is a bridge by the dev->hdr_type = 0x01 || 0x02.
That is a dangerous rename and is likely to cause difficult to
identify bugs in any code you've missed.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists