[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9501398424331@webcorp1f.yandex-team.ru>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:12:11 +0400
From: Roman Gushchin <klamm@...dex-team.ru>
To: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Real-time scheduling policies and hyper-threading
25.04.2014, 00:16, "Kirill Tkhai" <tkhai@...dex.ru>:
> 24.04.2014, 22:59, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>:
>
> [snip]
>
>>> Does anyone use rt-scheduler for runtime-like cpu-bound tasks?
>> So in general cpu bound tasks in the RT classes (FIFO/RR/DEADLINE) are
>> bad and can make the system go funny.
>>
>> For general system health it is important that various system tasks
>> (kthreads usually) can run. Many of these kthreads run at !rt prios, and
>> by having cpu bound tasks in rt prios they don't get to run.
>
> One more word to this. I had such expirience on 2.6.33 kernel with RT patch
> and weak hardware (sparc32).
>
> Networking was actively used and application did not use any IO operations.
>
> User needs to set all RT priorities by himself. It's necessary to set RT
> priorities at least for softirqs and rcus. RT bandwidth must be switched
> off.
I disable RT bandwidth sharing and change rt_period/rt_runtime to 1/100 ms
respectively.
Thanks,
Roman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists