linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / LPSS: Support for fractional divider clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1398433454.11914.268.camel@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Apr 2014 16:44:14 +0300
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...el.com>,
	Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...el.com>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / LPSS: Support for fractional divider clock

On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 15:22 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> The dividers are available for UART and SPI on both
> Lynxpoint and Baytrail. With SPI, handling the dividers is
> optional, but in case of UART they should be adjusted
> according to the requested baud rate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> index 69e29f4..508ac9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct lpss_device_desc {
>  	unsigned int prv_offset;
>  	size_t prv_size_override;
>  	bool clk_gate;
> +	bool clk_divider;
>  	struct lpss_shared_clock *shared_clock;
>  	void (*setup)(struct lpss_private_data *pdata);
>  };
> @@ -119,16 +120,11 @@ static struct lpss_device_desc byt_pwm_dev_desc = {
>  	.shared_clock = &pwm_clock,
>  };
>  
> -static struct lpss_shared_clock uart_clock = {
> -	.name = "uart_clk",
> -	.rate = 44236800,
> -};
> -
>  static struct lpss_device_desc byt_uart_dev_desc = {
>  	.clk_required = true,
>  	.prv_offset = 0x800,
>  	.clk_gate = true,
> -	.shared_clock = &uart_clock,
> +	.clk_divider = true,
>  	.setup = lpss_uart_setup,
>  };
>  
> @@ -246,8 +242,35 @@ static int register_device_clock(struct acpi_device *adev,
>  		parent = shared_clock->name;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (dev_desc->clk_divider) {
> +		char *name = kzalloc(strlen(dev_name(&adev->dev)) + 8,
> +				     GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!name)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		strcpy(name, "div_clk-");
> +		strcat(name, dev_name(&adev->dev));

Just kasprintf() instead of a few LOCs?

> +
> +		clk = clk_register_fractional_divider(NULL, name, parent, 0,
> +					pdata->mmio_base + dev_desc->prv_offset,
> +					1, 15, 16, 15, 0, NULL);
> +		parent = name;
> +
> +		name = kzalloc(strlen(dev_name(&adev->dev)) + 11, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!name)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		strcpy(name, "clk_update-");
> +		strcat(name, dev_name(&adev->dev));

Ditto.

> +
> +		clk = clk_register_gate(NULL, name, parent,
> +					CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_GATE,
> +					pdata->mmio_base + dev_desc->prv_offset,
> +					31, 0, NULL);
> +		parent = name;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (dev_desc->clk_gate) {
> -		clk = clk_register_gate(NULL, dev_name(&adev->dev), parent, 0,
> +		clk = clk_register_gate(NULL, dev_name(&adev->dev), parent,
> +					CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
>  					pdata->mmio_base + dev_desc->prv_offset,
>  					0, 0, NULL);
>  		pdata->clk = clk;


-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/