[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <535A7E49.8000809@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 09:24:57 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for property names
On 04/24/2014 12:22 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
> The downside of not allowing the gpiod API to support the -gpio suffix
> is that we'll never be able to convert drivers that use such a binding
> and will forever have a hodgepodge of GPIO APIs that we need to support.
Perhaps rather than making the existing gpiod API automatically search
for both -gpios and -gpio, we could make a new API for the other suffix,
so that driver indicate explicitly which property name they want. That
way, someone can't accidentally write -gpio in the DT and have it still
work. Or, add a parameter to the existing API, but that's probably a lot
more churn.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists