linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl-baytrail: fix for irq descriptor conflict on ASUS T100TA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1398438814.2708.141.camel@adam.happyassassin.net>
Date:	Fri, 25 Apr 2014 08:13:34 -0700
From:	Adam Williamson <awilliam@...hat.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	"Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl-baytrail: fix for irq descriptor conflict on
 ASUS T100TA

On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 11:32 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Well, I just ran another test too. I built a kernel (3.15rc2) with both
> > v3 of Doug's SDIO device enumeration patch -
> > http://dougvj.net/baytrail_gpio_quirk_v3.patch - and the new patch for
> > the IRQ allocation issue by Thomas Gleixner,
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4051581/ . That kernel gives me a
> > working touchscreen. Note that
> > http://dougvj.net/baytrail_gpio_quirk_v3.patch includes both the blocks
> > you mention (i.e. it adds INT33FC in both places).
> >
> > So, it really seems like for me at least, it's the combination of Doug's
> > patch and your approach to fixing the IRQ allocation issue that breaks
> > the touchscreen. Thomas' approach, even combined with Doug's patch,
> > seems to work fine.
> 
> Please make sure to provide a Tested-by: tag to Thomas so he
> knows this is merge material.

Well, I'd rather someone test on the box that's actually affected by the
IRQ allocation conflict lockups so we can confirm it actually fixes
them :)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/