[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140425184327.GH26782@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 20:43:27 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: idle: Add sched balance option
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 07:01:23PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> As the sysctl is some kind of ABI, I would like to make sure we reach a
> consensus and discuss a bit about that.
We could make it a sysfs file, like /sys/power/state, which when read
provides the words it takes.
That is more flexible than a numeric sysctl for which we have to keep an
enumeration.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists