[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <535AB0B5.8060305@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:00:05 -0400
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] timekeeping: Improved NOHZ frequency steering
On 04/24/2014 07:04 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> Continuing the sporadic work on improving the timekeeping
> frequency steering logic when NOHZ is enabled, I've made a number
> of changes to my re-implementation of Miroslav's patch (most
> recently posted here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/12/401 ),
> and I'm getting much closer results in the simulator.
>
> Compared with Miroslav's patch, this avoids doing any extra
> divisions, and instead approximates the correction
> logarithmically. In addition to trying to lower overhead, this
> allows the other accounting bits to be managed in much the
> same way we have been doing for awhile.
>
> This patch set contains one portion from Miroslav's patch
> (ntp_tick caching) split out into a separate logical patch.
>
> Below are some of the simulator results (BTW Miroslav, w/ 3.15-rc,
> you'll need to revert b399fe355b30d01 to get the simulator building)
> comparing this patchset to Miroslav's patch to show we're getting in
> the right order of magnitude.
>
John, I'm going to put this into a weekend long test right away (along with
another unrelated cpupower patch). I'll ping back Monday to let you know how it
went.
P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists