[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <535AEAB9.6020707@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 01:07:37 +0200
From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@...sung.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Vyacheslav Tyrtov <v.tyrtov@...sung.com>,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Romain Naour <romain.naour@...nwide.fr>,
Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Add support for EXYNOS5410 SoC
Hi Kevin,
On 26.04.2014 00:52, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@...sung.com> writes:
>
>> EXYNOS5410 is SoC in Samsung's Exynos5 SoC series.
>> Add initial support for this SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@...sung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Tyrtov <v.tyrtov@...sung.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
>> index 5eead53..83ae5fb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
>> @@ -95,8 +95,8 @@ static inline void platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, int *spurious)
>> for (;;) {
>>
>> /* make cpu1 to be turned off at next WFI command */
>> - if (cpu == 1)
>> - __raw_writel(0, S5P_ARM_CORE1_CONFIGURATION);
>> + if (cpu > 0)
>> + __raw_writel(0, S5P_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(cpu));
>
> This looks like a fix that's probably not specific to the 5410 and maybe
> deserves it's own patch?
>
> [...]
>
>> @@ -107,14 +111,14 @@ static int exynos_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
>> */
>> write_pen_release(phys_cpu);
>>
>> - if (!(__raw_readl(S5P_ARM_CORE1_STATUS) & S5P_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN)) {
>> + if (!(__raw_readl(S5P_ARM_CORE_STATUS(cpu)) & S5P_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN)) {
>> __raw_writel(S5P_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN,
>> - S5P_ARM_CORE1_CONFIGURATION);
>> + S5P_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(cpu));
>>
>> timeout = 10;
>>
>> /* wait max 10 ms until cpu1 is on */
>> - while ((__raw_readl(S5P_ARM_CORE1_STATUS)
>> + while ((__raw_readl(S5P_ARM_CORE_STATUS(cpu))
>> & S5P_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN) != S5P_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN) {
>> if (timeout-- == 0)
>> break;
>
> ...and this hunk too?
Yes, they do, but we are currently refactoring this code anyway.
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists