linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf tools: Cache register accesses for unwind processing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1398608961.1689.9.camel@leonhard>
Date:	Sun, 27 Apr 2014 23:29:21 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf tools: Cache register accesses for unwind
 processing

Hi Jiri,

2014-04-17 (목), 19:39 +0200, Jiri Olsa:
> Caching registers value into an array. Got about 4% speed up
> of perf_reg_value function for report command processing
> dwarf unwind stacks.

I'm not familiar with the code base, so probably silly questions:  Where
does the speed up come from?  IOW I don't know what's the difference
between the regs->regs and regs->cached_regs.  And does the cached_regs
contain correct values of registers for each frame?

Thanks,
Namhyung

> 
> Output from report over 1.5 GB data with DWARF unwind stacks:
> (TODO fix perf diff)
> 
>   current code:
>    6.81%  perf.old  perf.old                   [.] perf_reg_value
> 
>   change:
>    2.24%  perf      perf                       [.] perf_reg_value
> 
> And little bit of speed up:
> 
>  Performance counter stats for './perf.old report -i perf-test.data --stdio':
> 
>    134,664,011,577      cycles:u                  #    2.472 GHz
>    189,677,227,475      instructions:u            #    1.41  insns per cycle
>       54465.096050      task-clock (msec)         #    0.998 CPUs utilized
> 
>       54.598339009 seconds time elapsed
> 
>  Performance counter stats for './perf report -i perf-test.data --stdio':
> 
>    124,478,681,672      cycles:u                  #    2.466 GHz
>    168,998,379,866      instructions:u            #    1.36  insns per cycle
>       50487.110482      task-clock (msec)         #    0.997 CPUs utilized
> 
>       50.635824229 seconds time elapsed
> 
> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
> Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/event.h     |  5 +++++
>  tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h |  4 +++-
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/event.h b/tools/perf/util/event.h
> index 38457d4..970d4eb 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/event.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/event.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>  #include "../perf.h"
>  #include "map.h"
>  #include "build-id.h"
> +#include "perf_regs.h"
>  
>  struct mmap_event {
>  	struct perf_event_header header;
> @@ -87,6 +88,10 @@ struct regs_dump {
>  	u64 abi;
>  	u64 mask;
>  	u64 *regs;
> +
> +	/* Cached values/mask filled by first register access. */
> +	u64 cache_regs[PERF_REGS_MAX];
> +	u64 cache_mask;
>  };
>  
>  struct stack_dump {
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
> index a3539ef..43168fb 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -1,11 +1,15 @@
>  #include <errno.h>
>  #include "perf_regs.h"
> +#include "event.h"
>  
>  int perf_reg_value(u64 *valp, struct regs_dump *regs, int id)
>  {
>  	int i, idx = 0;
>  	u64 mask = regs->mask;
>  
> +	if (regs->cache_mask & (1 << id))
> +		goto out;
> +
>  	if (!(mask & (1 << id)))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> @@ -14,6 +18,10 @@ int perf_reg_value(u64 *valp, struct regs_dump *regs, int id)
>  			idx++;
>  	}
>  
> -	*valp = regs->regs[idx];
> +	regs->cache_mask |= (1 << id);
> +	regs->cache_regs[id] = regs->regs[idx];
> +
> +out:
> +	*valp = regs->cache_regs[id];
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
> index d6e8b6a..80d8ab1 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
> @@ -2,15 +2,17 @@
>  #define __PERF_REGS_H
>  
>  #include "types.h"
> -#include "event.h"
>  
>  #ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
>  #include <perf_regs.h>
>  
> +struct regs_dump;
> +
>  int perf_reg_value(u64 *valp, struct regs_dump *regs, int id);
>  
>  #else
>  #define PERF_REGS_MASK	0
> +#define PERF_REGS_MAX	0
>  
>  static inline const char *perf_reg_name(int id __maybe_unused)
>  {



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/